Hamilton Rowan and the Bar.

Chapter XLI.

Hamilton Rowan and the Bar.

Sketch of the character of Mr. Hamilton Rowan - His Quixotic spirit of philanthropy - Case of Mary Neil taken up by Mr. Rowan - Dinner-club among the briefless barristers of Dublin-Apparition of Mr. Hamilton Rowan and his dog - More frightened than hurt - An unanswerable query - Mr. Rowan’s subsequent adventures - The Rev. Mr. Jackson - He is brought up to receive sentence for high-treason, and expires in Court.

There were few persons whose history was connected with that of Ireland during my time, who excited my interest in a greater degree than Mr. Hamilton** **Rowan. The dark points of this gentleman’s character have been assiduously exhibited by persons who knew little or nothing of his life, and that, too, long after he had ceased to be an obnoxious character. I will endeavour to shew the obverse of the medal; and I claim the meed of perfect disinterestedness, which will, I think, be awarded, when I state that I never had the least social intercourse with Mr. Rowan, whose line of politics was always decidedly opposed to my own.

Archibald Hamilton Rowan, I believe he still lives, is a gentleman of most respectable family and of ample fortune: considered merely as a private character, I fancy there are few who will not give him full credit for every quality which does honour to that station in society. As a philanthropist, he certainly carried his ideas even beyond reason, and to a degree of excess which J really think laid in his mind the foundation of all his enthusiastic proceedings, both in common life and in politics.

The first interview I had with this gentleman did not occupy more than a few minutes; but it was of a most impressive nature, and though now eight-and-thirty years back, appears as fresh to my eye as if it took place yesterday; in truth, I believe it must be equally present to every individual of the company who survives, and is not too old to remember anything.

There is generally in every metropolis some temporary incident which serves as a common subject of conversation - something which *nominally *excites interest, but which in fact nobody cares a *sous *about, though for the day it sells all the newspapers, and gives employment to every tongue, till some new occurrence happens to work up curiosity and change the topic.

In 1788, a very young girl, of the name of Mary Neil, had been ill-treated by a person unknown, aided by a woman. The late Lord Carhampton was supposed to be the transgressor, but without any proof whatsoever of ‘his lordship’s culpability. The humour of Hamilton Rowan, which had a sort of Quixotic tendency to resist all oppression and to redress every species of wrong, led him to take up the cause of Mary Neil with a zeal and enthusiastic perseverance which nobody but the knight of La Mancha could have exceeded. Day and night the ill-treatment of this girl was the subject of his thoughts, his actions, his dreams: he even went about preaching a kind of crusade in her favour, and succeeded in gaining a great many partisans among the citizens; and in short, he eventually obtained a conviction of the woman as accessory to a crime, the perpetrator whereof remained undiscovered, and she accordingly received sentence of death.

Still Mary Neil was not bettered by this conviction: she was utterly unprovided for, had suffered much, and seemed quite wretched. Yet there were not wanting persons who doubted her truth, decried her former character, and represented her story as that of an impostor: this not only hurt the feelings and philanthropy; but the pride of Hamilton Rowan; and he vowed personal vengeance against all her calumniators, high and low.

At this time about twenty young barristers, including myself, had formed a dinner club in Dublin. We had taken large apartments for the purpose, and, as we were not vet troubled with *too much *business, were in the habit of faring luxuriously every day, and taking a bottle of the best claret which could be obtained.

[One of us, Counsellor Townley Fitgate, afterwards chairman of Wicklow County, having a pleasure cutter of his own in the harbour of Dublin, used to send her to smuggle claret for us from the Isle of Man; he made a friend of one of the tide-waiters, and we consequently had the very best wines On the cheapest possible terms.]

There never existed a more cheerful nor half so cheap a dinner club. One day, whilst dining with our usual hilarity, the servant informed us that a gentleman below stairs desired to be admitted *for a moment. *We considered it to be some brother barrister who requested permission to join our party, and desired him to be shewn up. What was our surprise, however, on perceiving the figure that presented itself! - a man who might have served as model for a Hercules, his gigantic limbs conveying the idea of almost supernatural strength, his shoulders, arms, and broad chest were the very emblems of muscular energy, and his flat, rough countenance, overshadowed by enormous dark eyebrows, and deeply furrowed by strong lines of vigour and fortitude, completed one of the finest yet most formidable figures I had ever beheld. He was very well dressed: close by his side stalked in a shaggy Newfoundland dog of corresponding magnitude, with hair a foot long, and who, if he should be voraciously inclined, seemed well able to devour a barrister or two without overcharging his stomach. As he entered, indeed, he alternately looked at us and then up at his master, as if only awaiting the orders of the latter to commence the onslaught. His master held in his hand a large, yellow, knotted club, slung by a leathern thong round his great wrist; he had also a long small-sword by his side.

This apparition walked deliberately up to the table, and having made his obeisance with seeming courtesy, a short pause ensued, during which he looked round on all the company with an aspect, if not stern, yet ill-calculated to set our minds at ease either as to his or his dog’s ulterior intentions.

“Gentlemen!” at length be said, in a tone and with an air at once so mild and courteous, nay, so polished, as fairly to give the lie, as it were, to his gigantic and threatening figure; “Gentlemen I have heard with very great regret that some members of this club have been so indiscreet as to calumniate the character of Mary Neil, which, from the part I have taken, I feel identified with my own. If any present hath done so, I doubt not he will now have the candour and courage to avow it. Who avows it?” The dog looked up at him again; he returned the glance, but contented himself for the present with patting the animal’s head, and was silent: so were we.

The extreme surprise, indeed, with which our party was seized, bordering almost on consternation, rendered all consultation as to a reply out of the question, and never did I see the old axiom that “what is everybody’s business is nobody’s business” more thoroughly exemplified. A few of the company whispered each his neighbour, and I perceived one or two steal a fruit-knife under the table-cloth, in case of extremities, but no one made any reply We were eighteen in number, and as neither would or could answer for the others, it would require eighteen replies to satisfy the giant’s single query; and I fancy some of us *could not *have replied to his satisfaction, and stuck to the truth into the bargain.

He repeated his demand, elevating his tone each time, thrice: “Does any gentleman avow it?” A faint buzz now circulated round the room, but there was no *answer *whatsoever. Communication was cut off and there was a dead silence. At length our visitor said with a loud voice, that he must suppose if any gentleman had made any observations or assertions against Mary Neil’s character, he would have had the courage and spirit to avow it; “therefore,” continued he, “I shall take it for granted that my information was erroneous, and, in that point of view, I regret having *alarmed *your society.”

And without another word he bowed three times very low, and retired backwards toward the door, his dog also backing out with equal politeness, where with a salam doubly ceremonious Mr. Rowan ended this extra-ordinary interview. On the first of his departing bows, by a simultaneous impulse, we all rose and returned his salute, almost touching the table with our noses, but still in profound silence, which *booing *on both sides was repeated, as I have said, till he was fairly out of the room. Three or four of the company then ran hastily to the window to be *sure *that he and the dog were clear off into the street; and no sooner had us satisfactory *denouement *been ascertained than a general roar of laughter ensued, and we talked it over in a hundred different ways. The whole of our arguments, however, turned upon the question, “Which had behaved the *politest *upon the occasion?” but not one word was uttered as to which had behaved the stoutest.

This spirit of false chivalry, which took such entire possession of Hamilton Rowan’s understanding was soon diverted into the channels of political theory, and from the discussion of general politics he advanced to the contemplation of sedition. His career in this respect was short; he was tried and convicted of circulating a factious paper, and sentenced to a heavy fine and a long imprisonment, during which political charges of a much more serious nature were arrayed against him. He fortunately escaped from prison to the house of Mr. Evans, of Portrenne, near Dublin, and got off in a fishing-boat to France, where, after numerous dangers, he at length arrived safely. Rowan subsequently resided some years in America, in which country he had leisure for reflection, and saw plainly the folly and mischief of his former conduct.

The Government found that his contrition was sincere; he eventually received His Majesty’s free pardon, and I have since seen him and his family at the Castle drawing-rooms in dresses singularly splendid, where they were well received by the Viceroy and by many of the nobility and gentry; and people should consider that His Majesty’s free pardon for political offences is always meant to *wipe away *every injurious feeling from his subjects’ recollection.

The mention of Mr. Rowan reminds me of an anecdote of a singular nature, extremely affecting, and which at the time was the subject of much conversation; and as a connection was alleged to exist between him and the unfortunate gentleman to whom it relates, which connection had nearly proved fatal to Mr. Rowan, I consider this not an inappropriate place to allude to the circumstance.

Mr. Jackson, an English clergyman who had come over to assist in organising a revolution in Ireland, had been arrested in that country, tried, and found guilty of high treason in corresponding with the enemy in France. I was in court when Mr. Jackson was brought up to receive sentence of death; and I believe whoever was present must recollect it as one of the most touching and uncommon scenes which appeared during that eventful period.

He was conducted into the usual place where prisoners stand to receive sentence. He was obviously much affected as he entered; his limbs seemed to totter, and large drops of perspiration rolled down his face. He was supposed to *fear death, *and to be in great terror. The judge began the usual admonition before he pronounced sentence: the prisoner seemed to regard it but little appearing abstracted by internal agony. This was still attributed to apprehension: he covered his face, and seemed sinking; the judge paused, the crowd evinced surprise, and the sheriff; on examination, declared the prisoner was *too ill *to *hear *his sentence. Meanwhile; the wretched culprit continued to droop, and at length his limbs giving way, he fell! A visitation so unexampled created a great sensation in the court; a physician was immediately summoned, but too late: Jackson had eluded his denouncers, and was no more.

It was discovered that previous to his coming into court he had taken a large quantity of arsenic and aquafortis mixed in tea. No judgment of course was pronounced against him. He had a splendid funeral; and to the astonishment of Dublin it was attended by several members of parliament and barristers! - a Mr. Tigh and Counsellor Richard Guinness were amongst them.

It is worthy of observation, that I was always on friendly, nay intimate terms, with many leading persons of the two most hostile and intolerant political bodies that could possibly exist together in one country; and in the midst of the most tumultuous and bloody scenes, I did not find that I had one enemy. It is singular, but true, that my attachment to the Government, and my activity in support of it yet placed me in no danger from its inveterate enemies; and in several instances I was sought as mediator between the rebel and Lord Kilwarden, then attorney-general, [He was at that time Mr. Wolfe. An information *ex-officio *had been filed against a printer in Cork for a seditious newspaper: it turned out that the two Counsellor Sheers were the real editors. They begged of me to mediate with the attorney-general. He had always a strong feeling for the honour and character of his profession, and forgave all parties on conditions which I all but *vouched for, *but to which they certainly did not adhere.] of whom, now be is no more, it is but justice to say, that of all the law officers and official servants of the Crown I ever had communication with, the most kind-hearted, clement, and honourable was one whose manners and whose name conveyed a very different reputation. I know that he had been solicited to take some harsh measures as to the barristers who attended Jackson’s funeral; and though he might have been justified in doing so, he said “that both the honour of his profession and the feelings of his own mind prevented him from giving publicity to or stamping as a crime what he was sure in its nature could only be inadvertency.”

Barrington Index. Home.